Note: this post has been a log time coming. I actually wrote it in May 2024 but decided to wait a year before posting it in case I changed my mind. But I didn't...
I had several goals for my layout:
1.) I wanted to accurately model something to the best of my ability.
I was well on my way to accomplishing that. Every detail on my layout matches the D&H Colonie Main to the best of my knowledge as it was in May of 1984. This proved to be a two-edged sword. I didn't have the hard decision making process of what to put where: the prototype already took care of that for me. But, if I didn't have a photograph of a certain area I was essentially "stuck" until I could figure it out, and the reality was I might never research the answer.
Plus, I couldn't really freelance anything on my layout- whether it be naming a business after a family member, or running equipment out of my designated time frame, or building a structure that I wanted just for fun. I scratched that itch instead with my MMR structures. When talking with author Michael Tylick about this, he said "Of course you can build what you want and run what you want". True... but not if I want to stick to my vision.
In short, my striving to be as realistic as possible had trapped me. It wasn't all bad, but I wish I had more freedom.
2.) I wanted a layout that would be fun to run AND prototypically operate.
As it turns out, running trains in circles was just fine for me but I got tired off having to constantly clean the track and check the nine benchwork section joints (including a lift bridge) every time I wanted to run. It was frustrating at times, and it sucked the enjoyment out of the process. I know I made my layout more complicated than necessary to allow it to move, expand, and reconfigure, but in the process I introduced problems that wouldn't have occurred if I had built standard benchwork. In essence, by trying to allow it to live forever, I might have killed it from the start.
As for prototypical layout operations, mainly switching, for reasons discussed below it was never very fulfilling.
3.) I wanted the use layout to help me earn my NMRA Master Model Railroader award.
This definitely did happen. The track plan and wiring were designed, built, and photographed from the very beginning work on my Electrical and Civil certificates. Along the way I built and included things to satisfy certain requirements that I otherwise didn't want (ex: a turntable and a section of super-elevated curves). But, it was definitely worth it to get those certificates.
And, the skills learned in scratchbuilding structures for my layout translated into earning my Cars and Structures certificates too. And I finally earned my award, MMR #776. None of my previous layouts have ever had enough scenery and detailing to qualify for the Scenery certificate, and this one won't either.
4.) I wanted it to keep me busy
I have discovered I have more fun researching and building stuff for my layout than actually running it. That is true for a lot of modelers. Having spent several hundred hours working on it so far, it certainly has done that. I enjoyed all of the research involved in planning it, starting with reading books and scouring online websites for information on industries. Then, I went out to take measurements and pictures of existing buildings or search for older pictures of now-gone structures. I draw up scale drawings and sketched maps of how various elements in each Layout Design Element fit together. And this was before I cut a single piece of styrene or laid a piece of track.
5.) I wanted to build a focused HO scale roster.
I have way more HO scale engines and cars than could ever fit on the layout but I enjoy putting together kits and detailing/weathering models. Whether it was engines, boxcars, TOFC flat cars, covered hoppers or cabooses, if it fit my era I wanted it. But, it is depressing to know that I can't see most of them because they are in storage. I remedied that for my engines with a display case, which helped somewhat. But running a 12-car train on my layout is a stretch, and nice long trains with multiple engines are just too much work to dig everything out, set it up, run it (and hope it didn't derail), and then put it all away. Also, since my roster contained just about everything I wanted, I stopped buying stuff.
So what went wrong?
I planned on building four sections representing the Capital District area of NY where the D&H ran. It was an ambitious project as I had never attempted scale modeling of actual prototypes before, but I jumped right in.
My first section, the North Albany Yard, was almost complete. I just needed to add a few backline details like telephone poles and trees, but that never happened. Mostly because the money I could spend for detail parts which would just sit there would be better spent on raw materials to construct the next parts of the layout. Finish detailing is usually the last step in the lifespan of a layout, and I never got there.
The problem was that the first section of the layout wasn't fun to operate as it just acted as a staging yard (on the operational tracks) and a demonstration of a yard being deconstructed (on the non-operational scenic tracks). I liked building it because it was so different from what I had done in the past, but once it was finished I didn't know what to do with it. Using the yard lead to make up and break down trains wasn't enjoyable because it was on a curve and hidden behind a hill, besides the yard could hold at most a dozen or so cars. And, you don't really need a staging yard if you rarely run trains!
My second section, Menands, was about 70% done. I needed to add a few more trees and details like telephone poles, as well as vehicles and figures. But I was pretty close to calling it complete. However, I had attempted to compress too much into the 7' length of this scene and that led to some visual and operational problems. My structures were too close together and prototypically operating them didn't work out as I expected.
The track leading to Agway has a bend in it that prevented freight cars from actually reaching the modeled loading door. The spur to Colony Liquor just barely clears a 50' boxcar but it is hard to see when spotting one at the door. The third, Southworth Machinery, stopped receiving rail service in 1981 and I later learned that the boxcar spotted at the loading ramp (which I had assumed meant it still received rail service) was only used for storage.
In conclusion, this section is a scenic feature that would be nice in a museum but not very functional to operate as a train layout. It was especially heartbreaking because I spent the most time building the structures on it and it was the very first part of the layout I designed at my old apartment. All that work for zero operational gain.
The third section was for Norlite and Keis Beverages. I never started it because to get there I had to model a road crossing on the corner section between this area and Menands. I was excited about adding operating crossing gates and sound, but even as I was researching it I realized my layout was doomed.
Besides, Keis never actually received rail service during the time I model (or anytime at all, so I have been told) and I didn't have enough space to model the extensive Norlite quarry facility effectively. So, again both would have been fun to build but they wouldn't have made the layout any more fun to operate. Sigh.
The fourth section, which I already removed and stored in my garage after a redesign in September 2023, was going to represent the Cohoes' Mohawk Paper plant. Due to a sharp incline to reach the siding, I already had to rebuild it once to lessen the grade. The section was essential for any semblance of operation as it had the only passing siding on my entire layout. But, it too didn't add much operationally.
The Mohawk Paper plant was allocated a tiny corner on the front of the layout, and most of the plant (like nearly every other one of my buildings) fell into the aisle. The scenery on this section would have been awesome though. A highway crossed the railroad tracks at grade, with a wall of trees behind it, and lots of residential houses along the backdrop. At least that was the plan. I realized it would not have fit into the scene only 2' deep and 7' long. So this section had to go. I never figured out what I would have replaced it with.
In sum... my four layout sections all provided me with interesting structure and scenery building opportunities but were not good as implemented for switching or prototypical operation. Running trains in circles was fun when it worked, but keeping the layout for that reason alone turned out to be a waste of space. Once I removed the Mohawk Paper section and eliminated the option for just letting trains run around and around, the layout ceased to serve any meaningful purpose.
So What's Next?
An old 2011 post by Trevor Marshall on his blog perfectly captured the state of where I was. To stop work on my layout would be to admit it was a failure, which it wasn't. But I haven't worked on it during the past two years except to trash parts of it. I can't blame it on lack of time. It is due to lack of interest. I don't want to press on with building a layout that isn't fun to operate, and the only way to save it would be to redesign all four sections again. One option I considered was to build two new sections (to complete the circle again) and perhaps model something besides the D&H on them (a farm scene? a station?). But that is just diluting what I have, and likely wouldn't satisfy me long-term.
My problem was I tried to stuff too much prototype main line into too small a space. I didn't know at the time that it would be a problem, but it was.
So, on the tenth anniversary of my blog, I am declaring my layout finished. This isn't a decision I am making lightly, and it isn't impulsive. I have mulled it over for a long time. But it is the right decision.
I am thinking about turning my North Albany section into a Fremo module, because I am really pleased with how it turned out. I may try and save the structures from my Menands section too.
I have been planning my next layout since 2020, and hinted at it for the past several years. It is a three-rail O scale railroad and features scale size (1:48) trains running through realistic but generic New England scenery. This allows me to build whatever I want and run whatever I want, and the larger size lets me focus more on detailing structures and scenes which I enjoy. A blog for for my the New England Northern Railway went live last fall.
This blog will continue as a catch-all for my various train interests. And, if I find more interesting D&H stuff I will definitely put it here. Only my O scale adventures will go on my new blog, so this one will live on. And who knows, I may someday return to model the D&H Colonie Main.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteA few thoughts about prototype accuracy. Years ago I worked on the large model railroad in the Cincinnati Union Station Museum complex which depicts the city in the 1940's built by Clarke Dunham Studios. Clarke mentioned that a clause was written into the project that when no accurate information was available he could use his imagination to fill in the gaps. I also remember reading a piece by a prototype modeler who described his frustration at not being able to find any photos for one side of a small but important structure he was building. It didn't make him feel any better that the undocumented side was conveniently not viewable from the layout edge. Don't sweat the small stuff and have fun with the project.
ReplyDeleteThank you Mike! I hope you are well. I really enjoyed our long call a year or so ago about my upcoming O scale layout. Thanks for the kind words.
DeleteThis is an excellent post (and thanks for the shout out).
ReplyDeleteThese are all good reasons to abandon a layout and so something new. As the Layout Design SIG says, "Only make new mistakes." The biggest mistake is hanging onto a layout that you no longer enjoy. This is a hobby - if it's not satisfying or enjoyable, it's wrong and time to do something else.
I've abandoned several layouts and I've never regretted it. I've always learned something from an abandoned layout and applied that knowledge to the next one.
I've also been able to take advantage of new supplies and techniques that weren't available when I started the layout, but which changed how I wanted to engage with the hobby. An example of this is DCC Sound. It changed how I run trains, which changed operating patterns and crew requirements. But it also benefitted from equipment with more space for the decoder and speaker, which made larger scales more attractive.
I look forward to seeing what you do next!
Thanks Trevor! I look forward to it too!
DeleteSounds like you are making a good decision, and this layout served you well. Do hope yo consider utilizing parts of this for a Free-mo module, would look forward to setting up with you at Springfield, which would allow you to run sone longer D&H trains!
ReplyDeleteThanks. I always enjoy talking with you at Springfield by the Free-mo set up.
Delete